We’re continually told that when it comes to email, personalisation is key. But the more we talk to B2C and B2B marketers throughout the country, the more it becomes apparent that a number of opportunities are increasingly being overlooked.
In some instances, it’s a case of simple oversights, which can be addressed quickly and easily to generate more powerful and relevant conversations. But in other cases, there is perhaps a genuine fear of the ‘headache’ that comes with truly personalised comms.
Keen to offer some advice on the subject and showcase where marketing automation technology can help, I recently spoke to industry journal Marketing Tech about this very topic. If you missed the write up, you can read it in full here…
“On average, we’re subjected to 5,000 marketing messages per day. It’s therefore no surprise that if you try to recall a promotional email that you received yesterday, you’ll struggle.
Research also estimates that a typical professional sends and receives 131 emails each day. Add to that the volume of social updates, SMS and IM conversations consumed during those waking hours and you’re faced with a vast amount of ‘noise’. Being heard is therefore paramount. But how do you achieve that all-important cut through?
Many marketers have pinned their hopes on email personalisation being the answer. This is good news, to a certain extent – personalisation is crucial. However, a number of marketers still don’t truly understand how to personalise. Greeting someone by their name, rather than simply sir/madam, is not enough. In fact, a personalised message, while important, is actually only one element that needs to be considered. There’s much more to truly personalised comms than meets the eye.
We need to begin by thinking about the number of consumers who will have been struck down with a bout of ‘content fatigue’. Our brains now know how to filter out irrelevant communications, even if only on a subconscious level, which explains why, generally, 80% of content still fails to drive any traffic or engagement. The growing importance of peer reviews and brand recommendations adds a further degree of complexity, making these increasingly savvy consumers harder to influence.
So what more can marketing departments do to improve lead nurturing best practice, through personalisation?
In truth, this advice could go on and on. But every recommendation points to an apparent underlying theme – micro-personalisation on a mass scale. So is this possible?
Technology has the power to be an enabler in this respect, but only if it is used intelligently. Marketers are more empowered than ever before to be highly targeted in their approach, before a conversation has even taken place. They no longer have to subscribe to the ‘one size fits all’ batch and blast philosophy, now that they have multichannel moments at their fingertips. But still so many do.
In fact, a number of marketers continue to favour volume campaigns, convinced that a higher send rate equals a higher number of conversions. Perhaps this is because it’s easier, and when it comes to impulse purchases or flash sales, it may work. Yet, generally speaking, it is just a waste of time. It may not damage the data, but it will inevitably be an exercise of diminishing returns.
Yes carefully crafted personalisation is harder. There’s a huge potential headache associated with harnessing meaningful insight from the big data that increasingly personalised marketing campaigns produce. It can feel like a minefield, especially if there isn’t the technology in place to obtain a single view and leverage the opportunity. But dynamic marketing automation platforms can now shoulder the bulk of the burden, especially with the growth of the API economy and the ability to integrate data from different sources.
It is possible to work to the ‘test, learn and optimise’ principle, triangulating data from multiple channels, campaigns and audiences, and benchmarking results from previous marketing ‘events’. In fact, marketers are unlikely to reap the true rewards of their personalisation efforts unless improvements are seen during this analysis phase.
Trends are always evolving of course and there will be further tips to offer in only a few months’ time. Also, due to the very definition of ‘personalisation’, there can be no ‘one size fits all’ advice.
However, throughout the changing marketing landscape we must remember we’re all human. So let’s maintain a common sense approach to the conversations we hold, and mimic this instinct and pragmatism when we communicate.”